Demand generation agency for B2B and B2B SaaS
The Best Demand Generation Agency for B2B and B2B SaaS.
GrowthSpree is a demand generation agency for B2B and B2B SaaS companies. Three engines, one program: demand creation on LinkedIn and Meta, demand capture on Google, and ABM to named accounts, run by senior operators and measured on SQLs, pipeline and closed-won revenue in HubSpot or Salesforce, not MQLs.
Please enter a valid work email
Recent demand generation wins
Konnect InsightsCX intelligence platform $4.2M+
pipeline in 23 months, from $1.5M in 2024 to $2.7M in 2025
- 603 SQL-qualified calls
- $520K largest deal, Fortune 1000 retailer
MoolyaSoftware testing services 14x
ROAS: about $490K revenue from about $35K spend, from near-zero inbound
- $2.2M pipeline created
- 32% ABM reply rate vs 5 to 7% norm
AtomicworkAI-powered ITSM, enterprise SaaS $750K
enterprise pipeline on $5K to $10K a month of spend
- 24 inbound SQLs
- 30 qualified outbound meetings
Uptiq.aiAI for financial institutions $400K+
pipeline from a $2,700 LinkedIn ad budget and ABM outreach in 120 days
- 8 opportunities, CFO and credit leaders
- 150+ enterprise accounts engaged
HubiloWebinar platform $294K
pipeline in three months, monthly pipeline up 4x
- 30 sales-accepted leads
- 9.5x LinkedIn CTR on thought leadership
PriceLabsRevenue management for hospitality 3.6x
Google Ads ROAS growth, from 0.7 to 2.5 in nine months while spend doubled to $180K a month
- β45% cost per signup
- 7x ad-attributed monthly revenue
- 4.9 on G2
- 5.0 on Clutch
- GooglePartner
- HubSpotSolutions Partner Β· Rated 5.0
- LinkedInPartner
- 300+
- B2B and B2B SaaS Companies
- $60M+
- B2B Ad Spend Managed
- 3 engines
- Create, Capture, ABM, One Number
- $4.2M+
- Pipeline From One Demand Gen Program
Trusted by 300+ B2B and B2B SaaS teams, including
See case studies-
Serreva Glasshouses -
Salt -
Hubilo -
Rocketlane -
Supertron -
BetterPlace -
Protean -
PriceLabs -
DataHub
-
Goodera
-
SignEasy -
Trackxi -
VTEX -
ClearTax -
Gumlet
-
Atomicwork -
Hatica -
Privado -
Konnect Insights -
Uptiq.ai
-
Playment -
Legistify -
AdOnMo -
MoveInSync -
LightMetrics -
Atheer -
CogniSaaS -
Fable -
Genloop -
SmartKarrot -
Venwiz -
Zelthy -
Crunchit -
Cimento AI -
Moolya -
Newton School - Fielddrive
- Hasura
- LimeChat
Your demand gen isn't failing. It's being measured on MQLs.
Most demand generation programs are judged on the number of forms filled this month. Our 2026 reports across $100M+ of B2B ad spend show why that breaks: the leads that are easiest to get are the least likely to buy, and the demand that closes was created months before anyone searched.
- 01
MQLs that sales rejects
MQL-to-SQL conversion averages 13% in B2B SaaS. In 437 head-to-head ad tests, cost per lead correlated 0.23 with pipeline and an ICP-fit score 0.66. Programs that count MQLs scale the 0.23.
- 02
Capture-only programs hit a ceiling
Search volume caps Google. Moolya started with near-zero inbound in a niche category; adding LinkedIn case-study ads and ABM took leads up 40x and pipeline to $2.2M on $35K of media.
- 03
Demand created in Q1 shows up in Q3
B2B journeys run 281 days from first touch to close, and default 7-day attribution captures 5 to 15% of revenue. Measured on 30 days, demand creation looks like a cost and gets cut.
Figures from GrowthSpree's 2026 Google Ads Waste Report, 2026 LinkedIn Ads Waste Report and 2026 Paid Ads Pipeline Disconnect Report, and the Moolya case study.
Demand generation results for B2B and B2B SaaS companies
A selection from the 300+ B2B and B2B SaaS companies we have worked with. The operating model is the same every time: create demand with the buying committee, capture it on search, and work named accounts, all on one pipeline number.
Konnect Insights $4.2M+ pipeline in 23 months
603 SQL calls across 6 markets, $520K largest deal
Read case study
Moolya 14x ROAS on about $35K spend
$2.2M pipeline, 12 closed-won, from near-zero inbound
Read case study
Atomicwork $750K enterprise pipeline
24 inbound SQLs and 30 outbound meetings
Read case study
Uptiq.ai $400K+ pipeline from $2,700 of ads
8 opportunities, 150+ enterprise accounts, with ABM
Read case study
Hubilo $294K pipeline in 3 months
Thought leadership, eBooks and competitor search
Read case study
PriceLabs 3.6x Google Ads ROAS growth (0.7 to 2.5) in 9 months
Capture engine at scale: $180K a month, published by Google as a case study
Read case study
Rocketlane $65 cost per lead on guides
Top-of-funnel content feeding a 36% cheaper demo
Read case study30+ published case studies
Google, LinkedIn, Meta, ABM and RevOps
View all case studiesPriceLabs boosts ROAS by 243% with AI Max and value-based bidding
Googleβs Google Ads team published this B2B case study on PriceLabs and named GrowthSpree as the agency. Value-based bidding plus AI Max for Search helped PriceLabs grow in France, Brazil, and Spain without trading away customer quality.
243%
Peak ROAS increase2.8x
High-quality users, QoQ4x
Faster regional scaling100%
MoM signups and trials
Read the PriceLabs case study - Objective
- Grow offline sales
- Google products
- AI Max for Search, value-based bidding
- Agency named
- GrowthSpree
“AI Max helped us identify emerging search demand in local languages, expand into new geos faster, and optimize campaigns in real time.”
Konnect Insights: $4.2M+ of pipeline from paid, ABM and intent data working as one program
Konnect Insights sells unified CX intelligence to enterprise retail, banking and telecom. Over 23 months we ran LinkedIn ABM ads to 14,000 target North American accounts, Google competitor campaigns at a $42 cost per lead, full-funnel retargeting, and localized outbound sequences in English, Spanish, Portuguese and German. Intent signals from G2 and Bombora triggered outreach that converted 3.4x better. Pipeline went from $1.5M in 2024 to $2.7M in 2025 as two markets were added.
$4.2M+
Pipeline, Jan 2024 to Nov 2025603
SQL-qualified calls$520K
Largest deal, Fortune 10003.4x
Conversion on intent-triggered outreach
Read the Konnect Insights case study - Create
- LinkedIn video ads at 4.2% CTR to 14K accounts
- Capture
- Google competitor terms at $42 CPL, retargeting
- ABM
- Localized sequences, intent triggers, executive gifting
Competitor displacement campaigns against Sprout Social, Sprinklr, Brandwatch and Talkwalker users outperformed generic demand gen by 2 to 4x. Multi-touch ABM cut deal velocity 37% in North America and Europe, and full-funnel retargeting cut cost per demo request 34%.
Want the same approach on your account? Meet the senior operator who would run it, and leave with a 90-day plan.
Meet an expertSix things you can verify before you sign
Most agency pitches sound the same. These are the parts of ours you can check for yourself.
-
Google wrote up our work
Google's own Google Ads team published PriceLabs as a case study and named GrowthSpree as the agency: 243% peak ROAS lift, 4x faster regional scaling.
-
Three engines, one team, one number
Demand creation, capture and ABM run by the same senior team against one CRM pipeline number, not a paid vendor and an outbound vendor arguing over attribution.
-
Junk leads never teach any platform
QLA scores every lead against your ICP before it becomes an offline conversion on Google, LinkedIn or Meta.
-
Creatives you can look at today
Ad creatives and landing pages for Konnect Insights, Gumlet, VTEX, Uptiq and more are public on Dribbble.
-
Test our AI before you hire us
Our Google, LinkedIn, Meta and HubSpot MCPs are free to start on your own accounts.
-
ABM is in the program, not an add-on
Target account lists, intent triggers, LinkedIn Matched Audiences and outbound sequences are built into every demand gen engagement. See the ABM service.
Three engines, and what each one is held to
Demand generation fails when the three engines are run by different people on different numbers. We hold each one to the job it is good at, and all three to the same pipeline number.
-
Create
Put the problem in front of the buying committee
LinkedIn Document, Video and Thought Leader Ads to job functions, seniority and named accounts; Meta retargeting at a fraction of LinkedIn's CPM; offers built from your reports and webinars. Held to engaged accounts and pipeline influenced, not CPL. Hubilo: LinkedIn CTR 0.59% to 5.62% on thought leadership. LinkedIn Ads →
-
Capture
Be first when the search starts
Google category, competitor and brand terms, plus retargeting across every platform. Held to cost per SQL. Konnect: competitor terms at a $42 cost per lead; Hubilo: Google cost per result $765 to $104 in three months. Google Ads →
-
ABM
Turn engaged accounts into meetings
Named account lists, LinkedIn Matched Audiences, intent signals from G2 and Bombora, personalized sequences by segment and language. Held to meetings and opportunities per account. Konnect: 603 SQL calls; Moolya: 32% reply rate. ABM service →
One account list feeds all three engines. Ads warm the accounts, intent and engagement pick the moment, outbound books the meeting, and the CRM shows which touches mattered.
Read our demand generation work thesisCreatives and landing pages, built by the same team that runs the ads
Demand creation lives or dies on the creative. Document and Thought Leader ads that earn a stop in a professional feed, offers built from material you already have, and persona pages that turn attention into a conversation. One studio builds all of it, and the work is public.
-
SerrevaMeta ads -
BambuserLinkedIn ads -
Konnect InsightsLinkedIn + Meta -
VTEXLinkedIn + Meta -
GumletLanding page -
HaticaLanding page -
MoveInSyncCompetitor page -
PayGlocalLanding page
-
Creative
Refreshed every 2 to 3 weeks
Static, carousel, video, Document and Thought Leader formats, picked by channel and funnel stage. Winners are the ads that produce SQLs, not the ads with the best CTR.
-
Landing pages
A page per persona and offer
Built in Webflow, Unbounce or Replit for B2B evaluation, with a 14-day CRO loop on heatmaps and session recordings. On Hatica, page active time rose 78% and demo conversion 2.4x.
-
Form or page
Chosen by deal size, not habit
Native lead forms under about $25K ACV, a persona page from $25K to $75K, and direct calendar booking or Conversation Ads above $75K and for named accounts.
All of it is public. Ad creatives and landing pages for Serreva, Gumlet, Konnect Insights, VTEX, Uptiq, Hatica, PayGlocal and more.
Browse the Creative Studio on DribbbleEverything demand generation touches, run by one team
Audiences, offers, creatives, landing pages, outbound, tracking and RevOps move together, owned by one senior team.
Demand Creation Campaigns
LinkedIn and Meta campaigns that put the problem in front of the ICP before they search.
- LinkedIn Document, Video and Thought Leader Ads by job function and seniority, with Super Title, seniority and company-size exclusions on day one
- Meta retargeting of site visitors, LinkedIn engagers and CRM lists, with lookalikes seeded on closed-won customers
Demand Capture Campaigns
Google Search and cross-platform retargeting for the moment intent appears.
- Category, competitor and brand campaigns split, negative keyword lists shared, Performance Max rebuilt by ACV tier with offline conversions
- Retargeting pools on every platform built from ad engagement, site visits and CRM stage
ABM Orchestration
Named accounts worked by ads and outbound together.
- Target account lists by segment, LinkedIn Matched Audiences and Meta custom audiences built from the same list
- Intent triggers from G2, Bombora and ad engagement decide which accounts get outreach this week, in which language
Attribution Across Engines
Pipeline influenced and sourced, per engine, on a 180-day view.
- Click identifiers stored on every contact; SQL, opportunity and closed-won sent back to each platform with a value ladder, with QLA keeping non-ICP leads out
- Multi-touch view of which ads, content and sequences touched each opportunity, because journeys average 281 days
RevOps & Pipeline Reporting
Three engines tied to one closed-won number.
- HubSpot workflows, lifecycle stages and lead routing set up to match how sales actually works, including ABM hand-offs
- Zipeline: spend, SQLs, pipeline and revenue by engine, channel and account on a 180-day view
How we run demand generation in the first 90 days
Capture is fixed first because it pays fastest, creation and ABM launch in the first month because they compound slowest. For product-led SaaS the same engines are trained on activated and paying users instead of SQLs.
- 1Days 1 to 7
Audit, tracking, account list
All paid accounts and the CRM audited against your ICP; offline conversions fixed; target account list and intent sources agreed
- 2Days 8 to 30
Launch all three engines
Google cleaned and relaunched; LinkedIn creation campaigns and Meta retargeting live; first ABM sequences out to engaged accounts
- 3Days 31 to 60
Train on pipeline
Value ladder by stage and ACV sent to every platform; QLA-scored SQLs and won deals become the signal; outreach re-targeted on intent
- 4Days 61 to 90
Move the money
Budget and list re-weighted on cost per SQL and meetings per account; offers that produced pipeline expanded, the rest retired
What we tell every ad platform each stage is worth
Starting weights relative to a form fill, calibrated to your ACV and sent through the Conversions API. Google, LinkedIn and Meta learn to chase buyers, not cheap forms.
- 1Days 1 to 7
Audit and tracking
Same audit; every platform connected to your product backend, click IDs stored on every signup
- 2Days 8 to 30
Cut the leaks
All three engines live; signup pages and onboarding-aware creative; trial non-converters retargeted and worked by outbound
- 3Days 31 to 60
Train on activation
Activation, PQL and paid events sent back from your product with weighted values
- 4Days 61 to 90
Fund what pays
Budget and lists follow paying users; the offers and segments that produced them expanded
What we tell every ad platform each user is worth
Starting weights relative to a signup, calibrated to your ARPA and activation rate. The platforms learn to find users who activate and pay.
The tools behind the daily checks
AI agents watch every account and the CRM each day for waste, fatigue, junk leads and warm accounts. A senior operator approves every change.
-
Zipeline
Cross-Engine System Monitor
One view of paid, ABM and the CRM pipeline
- Spend, SQLs, pipeline and revenue by engine, channel and account on a 180-day view
- Detects anomalies and budget leakage early
- Surfaces the budget and list moves for next month
-
QLA
Lead Quality Filter
Built to improve lead quality at scale
- Scores every inbound lead against your ICP before it reaches sales or trains a platform
- Keeps job seekers and non-ICP companies out of conversion data
- Feeds cleaner signals into bidding, routing and sequences
-
Marketing MCPs
AI Agent Layer Β· built by GrowthSpree
Connects Claude or ChatGPT to your Google, LinkedIn, Meta and HubSpot data
- Daily audits for waste, creative fatigue and non-ICP spend per platform
- Ranks target accounts by engagement and flags warm ones for outreach
- Free to start on your own accounts
-
LP Accelerator
Speed & Experimentation
Built for speed, not bottlenecks
- Rapid landing page and offer page design using Replit
- Faster messaging and offer testing per persona and segment
- No dependency on slow dev cycles
How GrowthSpree compares with other agency types
All of them say "demand generation". They differ in whether creation, capture and ABM share one team and one number, whether CRM outcomes reach the platforms, and what the fee is tied to.
| What to compare | GrowthSpree | Enterprise demand gen agency | Paid media specialist | Outbound or ABM agency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covered by one engagement | Paid creation, paid capture, ABM, and RevOps | Broad, often with content and brand; engines run as separate workstreams | Google, LinkedIn or Meta; outbound referred out | Outbound and lists; paid referred out |
| Fee and contract | Flat monthly fee independent of spend, month-to-month | Retainer plus 10 to 20% of spend, often 6 to 12 months | Often 10 to 15% of spend with minimums | Per-seat or per-meeting pricing, varies |
| Success metric | SQLs, pipeline and closed-won per engine, on a 180-day view | MQLs and pipeline, often on 30-day attribution | Leads and cost per lead | Meetings booked |
| Ads and outbound on one account list | Yes, with intent and engagement triggers | Sometimes, across teams | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Creative and landing pages | Designed and built in-house, public on Dribbble | In-house, often a separate studio team with its own queue | Creative sometimes, pages usually your problem | Email copy only |
| CRM outcomes sent back to the platforms | Yes, all three, with QLA filtering leads first | Sometimes | Pixel and CAPI, rarely CRM stages | Not applicable |
| Who runs the program | Senior operators on every account, no junior hand-off | Large teams; seniority varies by account size | Small teams; one specialist per channel | SDR pods |
GrowthSpree fits if you want demand creation, demand capture and ABM for B2B and B2B SaaS run by one senior team as one pipeline system, with creative and landing pages built in-house and one CRM source of truth.
What our G2 reviewers say about GrowthSpree
Rated 4.9 out of 5 on G2, and 5.0 out of 5 on Clutch. We read every G2 review; here is how often each theme comes up, including the one thing reviewers wish we did.
4.9out of 5
- 4+ stars on every review
- Every reviewer validated by G2
- 5.0 on Clutch 5-star rating
- 01
Works like an in-house teamHalf of reviews
Reviewers describe an extension of their own team: proactive, fast, and close to sales.
- 02
Multi-channel lead qualityNamed in reviews
"Generating high-quality leads on various platforms like LinkedIn and Google while also highlighting our work as a brand." Creative and landing page support comes up again and again.
- 03
Owns outcomes, not tasksMore than 1 in 4
Accountability for pipeline and revenue, not just lead volume.
- 04
End-to-end attribution1 in 4
Ads connected to HubSpot, the CRM, and analytics, so every dollar maps to pipeline.
- 05
AI-first operations1 in 5
MCPs and AI agents surface wasted spend before it compounds.
- 06
The honest critique1 in 6
The lack of content production, which GrowthSpree now covers for AEO and SEO through Salient. No video production.
Results reviewers reported
- 7.5x
ROI on paid ads across the US and UK
Financial services, mid-market - 6x
ROAS within six months, from $100K+ a month in ad spend
Software, mid-market - β38%
cost per SQL on about $200K a month across Google and LinkedIn
Internet, mid-market - 4.3x
revenue with 25% lower CPL in three to four months
IT services, mid-market - 20 to 25%
of monthly revenue from performance marketing campaigns
LimeChat, conversational commerce - $500K
revenue from performance marketing in six months
B2B commerce, verified reviewer
Figures as written by verified reviewers on G2. One reviewer reports a 38% lower cost per SQL on about $200K a month across Google and LinkedIn; another works with GrowthSpree "on paid marketing (mainly on Google and Facebook)" and saw a sizeable reduction in cost per lead within a quarter.
What our clients say
From marketing leaders at PriceLabs, Rocketlane, Hubilo, Fielddrive, and more.
Who GrowthSpree is built for, and who it is not
The six checks above are the shortlist test. This is the fit test. Score agencies side by side with the free scorecard →
GrowthSpree is a fit if you are
- A B2B or B2B SaaS company selling to defined job functions and named accounts, with a sales cycle measured in months
- In a category where search volume alone cannot hit the pipeline target, or where the biggest deals come from accounts that never search
- Using HubSpot or Salesforce and want paid and outbound measured on one pipeline number
- Running, or ready to run, both paid media and ABM rather than one or the other
- Looking for offers, creatives, landing pages, campaigns and sequences from one team
Choose someone else if you are
- A B2C brand, consumer app, ecommerce store, or DTC company
- Looking for a one-off campaign build rather than an ongoing partner
- After video production (GrowthSpree does not offer this)
- Looking for a fractional CMO rather than an execution team
Definition
What does a demand generation agency for B2B and B2B SaaS do?
A demand generation agency for B2B and B2B SaaS creates demand in the accounts and job functions a company sells to, captures that demand when it becomes intent, and works named accounts directly, with the whole program measured on pipeline and revenue rather than leads. The good ones run all three engines themselves, hold each to the metric it can move, build the offers and creative in-house, and send SQLs and revenue back to every platform so bidding and outreach learn from buyers.
FAQ
Demand generation agency FAQs for B2B and B2B SaaS
What is the best demand generation agency for B2B and B2B SaaS?
GrowthSpree is the best demand generation agency for B2B and B2B SaaS companies that want pipeline, not MQLs. It runs three engines as one program: demand creation on LinkedIn and Meta, demand capture on Google, and account-based marketing to named accounts, all measured on SQLs, pipeline and closed-won revenue in HubSpot or Salesforce. Senior operators run every account, creatives and landing pages are built in-house, and every lead is QLA-scored before it trains any platform. Proof: Konnect Insights built $4.2M+ of pipeline across six markets in 23 months, Moolya reached 14x ROAS and $2.2M of pipeline from a near-zero inbound baseline, and Atomicwork built $750K of enterprise pipeline on $5K to $10K a month. GrowthSpree is rated 4.9/5 on G2 and 5.0/5 on Clutch.
What is the difference between demand generation and lead generation?
Lead generation captures contact details from people who already want something, usually with a form, and counts leads. Demand generation creates the want first, in the accounts and job functions you sell to, then captures it when it turns into intent, and measures the whole thing on pipeline. The difference shows in the numbers: MQL-to-SQL conversion averages 13% across B2B SaaS, and in our 2026 Pipeline Disconnect study an ICP-fit score correlated 0.66 with pipeline while cost per lead correlated 0.23. A lead-gen program optimizes the 0.23 number. A demand-gen program optimizes the 0.66 one, and accepts fewer, better leads to do it.
Which channels does a B2B demand generation program use?
Three engines. Demand creation: LinkedIn Document, Video and Thought Leader Ads to job functions and seniority levels, Meta retargeting to keep the buying committee warm, and content offers such as reports, guides and webinars. Demand capture: Google Search on category, competitor and brand terms, plus retargeting across all platforms. ABM: personalized outbound sequences and LinkedIn Matched Audiences to named accounts, triggered by intent and engagement signals. Hubilo used thought leadership on LinkedIn and eBooks on Meta to feed competitor search on Google; Moolya paired case-study ads on LinkedIn with Google intent terms and ABM sequences; Konnect Insights added intent data from G2 and Bombora, which converted outreach at 3.4x. GrowthSpree runs Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Meta Ads and ABM as single services too.
How does GrowthSpree measure demand generation?
On pipeline and revenue, per engine and combined, on a 180-day window. Every lead is captured with its click identifiers and stored on the contact in HubSpot or Salesforce. SQL, opportunity and closed-won stages flow back to Google, LinkedIn and Meta as offline conversions with a value ladder, so the platforms optimize toward buyers. ABM engagement is logged at the account level so sales can see which decision-makers at which accounts have engaged. Reporting covers cost per SQL, pipeline created, closed-won revenue, and pipeline influenced versus sourced, because B2B journeys average 281 days from first touch to close and default 7-day attribution captures only 5 to 15% of revenue.
How does ABM fit with paid ads in a demand generation program?
ABM is one of the three engines, not a separate program: paid creates the awareness and ABM does the follow-through, on the same account list. LinkedIn Matched Audiences and Meta custom audiences are built from the target account list; outbound sequences go to the decision-makers at accounts that have engaged with ads, visited the site or shown intent on G2 or Bombora. For Konnect Insights, intent-triggered outreach converted at 3.4x and cut time-to-demo from 14 to 6 days, and multi-touch ABM cut deal velocity 37% in North America and Europe. For Uptiq, about 80% of opportunities came from LinkedIn messaging to accounts first warmed by $2,700 of LinkedIn ads. Moolya's ABM reply rate was 32% against a 5 to 7% cold-outbound norm because the accounts had already seen case-study ads.
How much should a B2B company spend on demand generation?
Enough for each engine to learn, which usually means $10K to $30K a month in media plus the outbound program. Google is sized to the search volume that exists for your category, LinkedIn needs $10K to $20K a month where CPCs run $8 to $25, Meta retargeting stays small, and ABM cost is mostly people and data. Niche categories can start lower because the audience is tight: Moolya reached 14x ROAS on about $35K of media over a year, Atomicwork built $750K of pipeline on $5K to $10K a month, and Uptiq built $400K+ on a $2,700 LinkedIn budget paired with outbound. The agency fee is flat and independent of spend.
How fast does demand generation show results?
Capture shows first, creation and ABM compound. Days 1 to 7 cover the audit, tracking fixes and account list. Days 8 to 30 cover launch across all three engines. Google and retargeting usually improve cost per SQL within 30 to 60 days. LinkedIn and ABM take 60 to 90 days to produce meetings, then compound: Konnect Insights went from 148 qualified calls in the first half of 2024 to 389 in 2025, Moolya grew leads 40x over a year from near zero, and Atomicwork reached $750K of pipeline. Judged on 30 days, demand creation always looks like a cost. Judged on 180 days, it is usually the largest source of pipeline.
What demand generation results has GrowthSpree delivered?
Konnect Insights: $4.2M+ pipeline across six markets in 23 months, 603 SQL-qualified calls, a $520K largest deal. Moolya: about $490K revenue from about $35K spend (14x ROAS), $2.2M pipeline, 200 leads to 116 MQLs to 84 SQLs to 12 closed-won. Atomicwork: $750K enterprise pipeline, 24 inbound SQLs and 30 outbound meetings on $5K to $10K a month. Uptiq.ai: $400K+ pipeline and 8 opportunities from a $2,700 LinkedIn budget plus ABM. Hubilo: $294K pipeline in three months from thought leadership, eBooks and competitor search. PriceLabs: the capture engine at scale, Google Ads ROAS up 3.6x, from 0.7 to 2.5, in nine months on $180K a month, published by Google as a case study. Rocketlane: $65 cost per lead on top-of-funnel guides and 36% lower cost per demo.
Does GrowthSpree produce the content for demand generation?
GrowthSpree builds the offers and the creative around them: ad creatives, landing pages, lead magnets assembled from your existing material, outbound sequences and short-form copy. It does not produce video. The gap G2 reviewers most often mentioned was content production, which GrowthSpree now covers for AEO and SEO through Salient. Most clients bring a report, a webinar recording or a set of case studies, and GrowthSpree turns them into Document Ads, Thought Leader posts, eBook offers and persona pages. Hubilo's March result came from video and thought leadership creative cut from material the team already had.