Client Success Story

How GrowthSpree Scaled Moolya's Paid Acquisition for Software Testing & QA Services

A leading software testing and QA services provider needed to scale enterprise lead generation across automation testing, performance testing, and security testing — without inflating CPL. Across an ₹17.1L (~$20.5K) paid spend over 8 months on Google Ads + LinkedIn, a phased full-funnel engine delivered 277 qualified leads, 92 high-intent MQLs, and a 2.3× LinkedIn CTR lift — all while keeping average CPL at ₹6,172.

277
Qualified Leads Delivered
92
MQLs (~33% Conv. Rate)
8.38%
Peak Google Ads CTR
Moolya logo
Moolya
Software testing & QA services for enterprises
Founded
2010
Headquarters
Bangalore, India
Company Size
501–1,000 employees
Sector
Software Testing & QA
Case Study at a Glance

Key Takeaways

GrowthSpree partnered with Moolya to build a structured, dual-channel paid acquisition engine across Google Ads and LinkedIn — engineered to generate qualified leads for software testing, QA, automation testing, and performance testing services while improving MQL conversion and lead quality month over month.

  • 277 qualified leads generated across 8 months (July 2024 – February 2025).
  • 92 MQLs delivered — a ~33% lead-to-MQL conversion rate.
  • Google CTR consistently > 7%, peaking at 8.38% in July 2024 — top tier for B2B services advertising.
  • LinkedIn CTR doubled: from 0.36% (July 2024) to 0.82% (January 2025) — a 2.3× lift through creative iteration.
  • Program-low CPL of ₹2,943 in September 2024 by concentrating spend on top-converting keywords.
  • Enterprise MQLs from BOFU + case study campaigns featuring Flipkart and PhonePe drove the highest-quality pipeline.

The Mission

Moolya is a leading software testing and QA services provider that helps enterprises ship reliable software through automation testing, performance testing, and security testing — serving software development, mobile application, e-commerce, and broader technology verticals. The mission for the H2 2024 + early 2025 program: scale qualified lead generation across Moolya's core service lines while sharpening MQL conversion, controlling CPL, and surfacing the kind of enterprise pipeline that case studies like Flipkart and PhonePe were built on.

The Challenge

Software testing and QA is a category where commercial intent is high — but so is competition. The buyer is a CTO, VP Engineering, or QA Director who already runs evaluations across the largest testing service brands in the world. Moolya needed paid acquisition that didn't just generate leads, but generated MQLs — leads with the budget, authority, and intent to actually buy enterprise-grade testing services. That meant disciplined channel allocation, ruthless keyword focus, and creative built specifically to convert enterprise decision-makers.

What We Were Up Against

Lead-to-MQL friction: volume alone wasn't enough — Moolya needed paid traffic that converted to qualified, sales-ready pipeline.
Crowded category auction: "software testing" and "QA services" keywords run hot with global competitors bidding aggressively.
LinkedIn CTR floor: CTR was sitting at 0.36% with creatives that didn't differentiate Moolya from larger testing service brands.
High LinkedIn CPL: early-program CPL trended well above the Google Ads baseline — risking quality-only / volume-zero results.
Enterprise buyers, long cycles: CTOs and VPs Engineering evaluate testing services across 3–9 month cycles — single-touch ads don't work.
Multi-service complexity: automation, performance, security, and mobile testing each needed distinct keyword sets and creative angles.

Our Strategy

We built a structured, dual-channel paid acquisition engine — Google Ads for high-intent volume capture, LinkedIn for enterprise-grade MQL reach, and creative built around proof points (case studies, named clients). Each service line got its own keyword cluster; each channel got the funnel role that matched its strengths.

1

Increase lead generation across Moolya's core services: software testing, QA, automation, performance.

2

Optimize CPL and Cost-per-MQL through sharper ad targeting and refreshed creative.

3

Enhance lead quality by focusing budget on high-converting commercial keywords.

4

Refine conversion tracking so every click was traceable from CTR through MQL to SQL.

The GrowthSpree Framework

Google Ads as the volume + efficiency engine. We concentrated bidding on bottom-funnel commercial intent — "software testing companies," "penetration testing services," "mobile application testing." CTR held steady above 7% across most months, peaking at 8.38% in July 2024. Impressions held above 50,000/month in peak months, with September delivering 62 Google leads at the program's lowest CPL of ₹2,943.

LinkedIn as the enterprise MQL layer. LinkedIn played mid-to-bottom funnel — running BOFU campaigns and case study creative featuring Flipkart and PhonePe. CPL ran higher than Google but the MQLs were enterprise-grade: testing decisions at scale. Over 8 months, LinkedIn CTR more than doubled (0.36% → 0.82%) through creative iteration and audience refinement.

Conversion tracking infrastructure. We refined Moolya's tracking so every click was traceable from impression to MQL — making it possible to identify which keywords, creatives, and campaigns drove not just leads but pipeline-ready conversations.

How GrowthSpree Saved the Day

Google Ads · Bottom-Funnel Volume Engine

Concentrated spend on top-converting commercial keywords ("software testing companies," "penetration testing services," "mobile application testing"). CTR consistently > 7% across most months, peaking at 8.38%. Drove 62 leads in September 2024 at the program-low CPL of ₹2,943.

8.38% Peak CTR
BOFU Volume Driver

LinkedIn · Enterprise MQL Layer

Ran BOFU and case study campaigns featuring Flipkart and PhonePe — surfacing enterprise CTOs and VPs Engineering. Despite higher CPL than Google, LinkedIn delivered the highest-quality MQLs and lifted CTR 2.3× (0.36% → 0.82%) through ongoing creative iteration.

2.3× CTR Growth
Enterprise MQL Source

Conversion Tracking & Quality Focus

Refined conversion tracking so every click was visible from CTR → Lead → MQL. Concentrated budget on keywords with proven MQL conversion. Result: ~33% lead-to-MQL conversion rate across the program — quality, not just volume.

~33% MQL Rate
Quality-Driven Pipeline

The Four Pillars That Made It Work

How a disciplined 8-month sprint moved Moolya from volume-only paid efforts to a quality-focused enterprise pipeline.

Pillar 1Jul–Aug 2024 · Launch & Learn
Establish keyword winners, validate channel mix, set MQL baseline
What we did

Launched Google Ads with full focus on commercial-intent keywords for software testing and QA services. CTR hit 8.38% in July — the highest of the entire program — with 50,416 impressions and 4,226 clicks. August saw budget recalibration (spend halved to ₹113K) to learn what was actually converting, while LinkedIn launched with case study creative for enterprise reach.

Spend & signal

July delivered 63 leads and 18 MQLs at ₹3,608 CPL — a strong baseline. August recalibrated to learn quality signals: 22 leads with 5 MQLs gave us the data to focus the next month on top-converting keywords.

8.38%
Jul Google CTR
85
Leads (Jul+Aug)
23
MQLs (Jul+Aug)
₹3.4L
Spend

Star insight: An 8.38% CTR in month one signalled that Moolya's positioning resonated with bottom-funnel commercial intent. The challenge wasn't attention — it was filtering for MQL-grade quality among the high volume.

Pillar 2Sep 2024 · Program Peak
The best month — 62 Google leads at the lowest CPL of the entire program
What we did

September was the playbook month. We concentrated Google Ads spend on the keyword cluster that proved itself in July ("software testing companies," "penetration testing services," "mobile application testing") and ran LinkedIn at full enterprise BOFU intensity. 62 Google leads landed at ₹2,943 CPL — the lowest of the program. LinkedIn added 15 leads at ₹3,200 CPL — also a LinkedIn low for the year.

Why it worked

Two things compounded. First, July+August had taught us which keywords actually generated MQLs — not just leads. Second, LinkedIn case study creative finally got the persona/message fit right, dropping CPL to ₹3,200 while pushing CTR to 0.38%. Together, September delivered 62 combined leads with 18 MQLs — the strongest month of the program.

62
Sep Leads
18
Sep MQLs
₹2,943
Lowest CPL
29%
MQL Rate

Star insight: The keyword concentration playbook in September became the template for the rest of the program. When you bid only on the keywords that have already proven they convert to MQL, you don't pay to learn the same lesson twice.

Pillar 3Oct–Dec 2024 · Quality vs Volume Tuning
Refining the engine — tighter focus, higher per-lead value
What we did

October scaled spend to ₹2.3L (the program's highest) to test ceiling capacity — yielding 30 leads at ₹7,620 CPL. We then tightened in November and December: stripped underperforming keywords, deepened bids on proven ones, and refined LinkedIn audiences. December re-established CPL discipline at ₹5,000 with 30 leads — proving that pulling back on volume often delivers better unit economics.

What we learned

The October scale-test was the most important data point of Q4. Not because it worked perfectly — but because it showed exactly where the CPL ceiling was. November and December operated under that ceiling, and that discipline carried into Q1 2025.

₹5.5L
Q4 Spend
75
Q4 Leads
27
Q4 MQLs
36%
Q4 MQL Rate

Star insight: Q4 was where the program shifted from "more leads" to "better leads." MQL rate climbed to 36% — the highest of the program — because every keyword had earned its place in the spend allocation.

Pillar 4Jan–Feb 2025 · LinkedIn Breakout
The LinkedIn CTR breakthrough — and the playbook for 2025 scale
What we did

By Q1 2025, the LinkedIn creative iteration paid off. January CTR hit 0.82% — more than 2.3× the July baseline of 0.36%. February held the lift at 0.80%. We pushed Google to ₹2.5L spend in January and ₹2.4L in February — driving 60,000+ Google impressions and 35–40 monthly leads. February closed the program with 40 leads, 12 MQLs, and the strongest LinkedIn quarter of the entire year.

Why it worked

The LinkedIn breakout in Q1 2025 wasn't a single change — it was the cumulative effect of 6 months of creative iteration, audience refinement, and case-study positioning. Once LinkedIn CTR cleared 0.8%, the channel finally started competing with Google on engagement quality. With Google scaling and LinkedIn converting, the engine was firing on both cylinders.

2.3×
LinkedIn CTR Lift
75
Q1 Leads
23
Q1 MQLs
₹4.9L
Q1 Spend

Star insight: LinkedIn breakouts compound. The 0.36% → 0.82% trajectory wasn't a step change — it was creative iteration over 6 months. The case study positioning around Flipkart and PhonePe finally found product-message fit with enterprise CTOs.

The Results

277
Qualified Leads
Jul 2024–Feb 2025
92
MQLs Delivered
~33% Conv. Rate
₹17.1L
Total Paid Spend
~$20.5K USD

From 277 leads to 92 high-intent MQLs, an 8.38% peak Google CTR, a 2.3× LinkedIn CTR lift, a program-low ₹2,943 CPL in September, and a 36% Q4 MQL rate — all delivered with disciplined keyword focus and creative iteration.

Performance Breakdown

How a phased, dual-channel engine turned a crowded category auction into a predictable enterprise MQL pipeline.

The Acquisition Funnel · Jul 2024 → Feb 2025
From ₹17.1L paid spend to 92 high-intent MQLs across 8 months of dual-channel optimization.
₹17.1L
Total Paid Spend
277 qualified leads ↓
277
Qualified Leads
92 MQLs (~33% conversion) ↓
92
Marketing Qualified Leads
enterprise pipeline ↓
SQL
Pipeline Aligned
Average blended CPL of ₹6,172 across the 8-month program · Average cost per MQL of ₹18,603 · September CPL hit a program-low of ₹2,943.
Monthly Lead Volume · Jul 2024 → Feb 2025
July and September were the volume peaks; Q1 2025 brought sustained scale.
Jul 2024 · ₹2.27L spendLaunch Peak
63
Aug 2024 · ₹1.14L spend
22
Sep 2024 · ₹1.74L spendBest Month
62
Oct 2024 · ₹2.34L spend
30
Nov 2024 · ₹1.71L spend
15
Dec 2024 · ₹1.50L spend
30
Jan 2025 · ₹2.50L spend
35
Feb 2025 · ₹2.40L spendQ1 Close
40
July and September posted the highest lead volumes (63 and 62). Q1 2025 (Jan + Feb = 75 leads) closed the program on an upward scale trajectory.
LinkedIn CTR · The 2.3× Lift
Creative iteration over 6 months more than doubled LinkedIn CTR.
Jul 2024Baseline
0.36%
Aug 2024
0.33%
Sep 2024
0.38%
Oct 2024
0.63%
Jan 2025Breakout
0.82%
Feb 2025
0.80%
From 0.36% in July to 0.82% in January — a 2.3× lift through iterative creative refinement and audience tightening.
Google Ads · CTR Held Above 7%
Best-in-class CTR sustained across the program even as spend scaled.
Jul 2024Peak
8.38%
Aug 2024
7.31%
Sep 2024
7.31%
Oct 2024
7.31%
Jan 2025Re-Scale
8.33%
Feb 2025
8.18%
Google CTR never dropped below 7.31% — well above typical B2B services benchmarks of 3–5%. Re-scaled to 8%+ in Q1 2025.
Channel CPL · Google vs LinkedIn
Google for efficiency; LinkedIn for enterprise MQL quality.
Google · Best CPL (Sep)
₹2,943
LinkedIn · Best CPL (Sep)
₹3,200
Google · Avg CPL
~₹5,800
LinkedIn · Avg CPL
~₹4,700
LinkedIn · Highest CPL (Oct)Outlier
₹8,674
Google was the volume + efficiency engine; LinkedIn was the higher-quality enterprise MQL layer. Both channels hit their lowest CPLs in September.
MQL Composition · Quality at Scale
~33% of all leads converted to MQLs — strong quality at this volume tier.
92 MQLs
MQLs (33%) 92 Other Leads (67%) 185
A 33% MQL rate is well above typical B2B services benchmarks (15–20%) — the payoff of keyword discipline and case-study creative.

Top Converting Keywords & Enterprise Case Studies

The highest-intent keywords that drove the MQLs — and the enterprise case studies that converted them on LinkedIn:

"software testing companies" "penetration testing services" "mobile application testing" "software testing services" "performance testing services" Flipkart Case Study PhonePe Case Study Enterprise QA Buyers E-commerce Platforms Mobile App Companies …and growing

What Made It Work

The strategic lessons behind a repeatable, dual-channel paid engine for B2B services.

Google for volume, LinkedIn for quality — not interchangeable

Google Ads delivered the volume and the efficient CPL; LinkedIn delivered the enterprise-grade MQLs through case-study positioning. Treating them as two halves of one engine — not competing channels — is what made the program work.

Keyword concentration beats keyword expansion

September's program-low ₹2,943 CPL came from concentrating spend on five proven commercial-intent keywords — not expanding to a hundred unproven ones. In a crowded auction, bidding deeper on what works beats bidding wider on what might.

Case study creative is the LinkedIn unlock

The Flipkart and PhonePe case study creative was what finally pushed LinkedIn CTR from 0.36% to 0.82%. Enterprise CTOs and VPs Engineering trust named, proven outcomes — and case studies are the most efficient way to deliver that signal at scale.

Quality compounds in Q4 and beyond

Q4 2024 hit the highest MQL conversion rate (36%) of the program — because every keyword and creative had earned its place. The discipline carried into Q1 2025, where the LinkedIn breakout finally arrived and Google scaled back to 8%+ CTR.

The Final Outcome

Moolya exited February 2025 with a repeatable, dual-channel paid acquisition engine — 277 leads, 92 MQLs, an 8.38% Google peak, and a LinkedIn CTR that more than doubled over the program. The marketing engine is now predictable, scalable, and ready for the next quarter of expansion. Here's where the program is headed next.

01

Optimize LinkedIn campaigns with refined audience targeting and improved creative formats to keep CTR climbing.

02

Expand Google Ads budget into high-performing keywords with low CPL and high MQL conversion.

03

Refine landing pages for conversion rate optimization — particularly for mobile users.

04

Scale case study campaigns (Flipkart, PhonePe) to drive brand trust and lift lead conversion.

Frequently Asked Questions

Across an ₹17.1L paid spend over July 2024–February 2025, GrowthSpree delivered Moolya 277 qualified leads, 92 high-intent MQLs (a ~33% MQL conversion rate), 8.38% peak Google Ads CTR with CTR consistently above 7%, a 2.3× LinkedIn CTR lift (0.36% → 0.82%), an average blended CPL of ₹6,172, and a program-low CPL of ₹2,943 in September 2024 — with high-quality enterprise MQLs surfaced through case study campaigns featuring Flipkart and PhonePe.
To increase lead generation across Moolya's core services — software testing, QA services, automation testing, and performance testing — while optimizing both cost per lead (CPL) and cost per MQL through refined ad targeting and creative. The program also focused on enhancing lead quality by concentrating on high-converting keywords and improving conversion tracking across Google Ads and LinkedIn.
Google Ads was the dominant volume and efficiency driver — consistently delivering lower CPLs while maintaining a steady flow of relevant leads, with CTR consistently above 7% (peaking at 8.38% in July 2024) and 50,000+ impressions per month. LinkedIn played a complementary role, generating higher-quality enterprise MQLs through BOFU and case study campaigns (Flipkart, PhonePe) — particularly valuable for software testing and performance testing services aimed at enterprise clients.
GrowthSpree is the #1 B2B SaaS marketing agency for performance marketing across the B2B technology stack — including software testing and QA services. The team identified high-converting keywords ("software testing companies," "penetration testing services," "mobile application testing"), allocated budget aggressively toward Google Ads where CPL stayed efficient, ran enterprise-focused LinkedIn BOFU campaigns leveraging Flipkart and PhonePe case studies, optimized landing pages for mobile conversion, and lifted LinkedIn CTR 2.3× through creative iteration and audience refinement.
Moolya is a leading software testing and QA services provider founded in 2010 and headquartered in Bangalore, Karnataka, India. With 501–1,000 employees, Moolya specializes in automation testing, performance testing, and security testing — serving enterprises across software development, mobile applications, e-commerce, and other technology verticals. Notable clients include Flipkart and PhonePe.
The top-converting keywords for Moolya's Google Ads campaigns were "software testing companies," "penetration testing services," "mobile application testing," "software testing services," and "performance testing services." These bottom-funnel commercial keywords drove the bulk of qualified leads and MQLs, with September 2024 hitting the program's lowest CPL of ₹2,943 by concentrating spend on this keyword set.
While LinkedIn CPL stayed higher than Google Ads, LinkedIn delivered disproportionately high-quality MQLs — particularly for enterprise-focused services where the buyer is a CTO, VP Engineering, or QA Director. BOFU and case study campaigns featuring real client wins (Flipkart, PhonePe) drove the strongest lead-to-sale conversion. LinkedIn's role is mid-to-bottom funnel enterprise reach; Google's role is bottom-funnel volume. Together they form a complete pipeline engine.
GrowthSpree is a B2B SaaS marketing agency that works on a flat $3,000/month, month-to-month engagement with no long-term lock-in. It holds a 4.9/5 rating on G2 and is a Google Partner and HubSpot Solutions Partner, with services spanning Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, account-based marketing, and RevOps.

Let Us Make Your Growth Our Obsession

A quick 30-minute conversation, no strings attached. See how a structured, dual-channel paid engine can turn a crowded category auction into a predictable MQL pipeline for your business.

Book a Strategy Call →