Client Success Story

How GrowthSpree Drove 28 SQLs & 15 Opportunities for LightMetrics with Targeted ABM

A dual-channel account-based program that engaged senior automotive and telematics decision-makers — and proved decisively which channel turns outreach into pipeline.

28
SQLs Generated
15
Opportunities Created
869
Contacts Reached
LightMetrics logo
LightMetrics
AI driver coaching & safety analytics
Founded
2015
Headquarters
Bengaluru, Karnataka
Company Size
50–200 employees
Sector
Video Telematics SaaS

LightMetrics × GrowthSpree — At a Glance

Client LightMetrics — AI driver-coaching & safety-analytics platform for automotive and telematics, founded 2015, Bengaluru
Problem A senior, niche ICP with no clear read on whether LinkedIn or email would convert cold outreach into pipeline
Result 28 SQLs and 15 opportunities from 869 contacts across 284 companies (9.86% interested rate)
Scope Dual-channel ABM (LinkedIn + email) to senior automotive & telematics decision-makers
  • GrowthSpree generated 28 SQLs and 15 sales opportunities for LightMetrics from 869 contacts across 284 companies.
  • LinkedIn outreach via Dripify delivered a 37.42% reply rate versus just 2.67% for email via Lemlist, settling the channel question decisively.
  • LinkedIn produced 24 of the 28 SQLs and 13 of the 15 opportunities, so investment concentrated there.
  • Senior decision-makers — Directors, VPs, and Founders — engaged most across automotive, telematics, and IT & Services.
  • Telematics and IT & Services were the strongest industries for SQLs, while Transportation and Logistics needed message refinement.

The Mission

LightMetrics is an AI-powered platform providing real-time driver coaching and safety analytics for the automotive and telematics industries. It specializes in improving fleet safety with cutting-edge solutions, working closely with automotive OEMs, Tier-1 suppliers, and telematics service providers.

The Challenge

LightMetrics needed to engage key decision-makers across its target industries and generate high-quality sales opportunities — reaching senior, hard-to-access buyers, converting them into SQLs and opportunities, and finding the outreach channel that delivered the highest return.

Key Challenges Identified

Senior, niche ICP: decision-makers at automotive OEMs, Tier-1 suppliers, and telematics service providers.
SQL generation: turning cold outreach into genuinely interested, sales-qualified conversations.
Opportunity conversion: moving SQLs into real opportunities through follow-up and nurturing.
Channel uncertainty: no clear read on whether LinkedIn or email would deliver the best ROI.

Baseline: Where LightMetrics Started

Baseline snapshot — before the dual-channel ABM program
Spend / channelsTwo channels were run head-to-head — LinkedIn (Dripify) and email (Lemlist) — because there was no prior read on which delivered better ROI.
CAC / cost modelNot a paid-media CAC — success was measured by SQLs and sales opportunities generated per outreach.
Conversion (SQL to opportunity)Cold replies had to be nurtured into SQLs and then real opportunities; SQL-to-opportunity conversion was unproven at the start.
TargetingA senior, niche ICP — decision-makers at automotive OEMs, Tier-1 suppliers, and telematics service providers.

Our Strategy

We built a targeted account-based program aimed at top-level decision-makers in LightMetrics' core industries, and ran it across two channels — Dripify (LinkedIn) and Lemlist (email) — to settle the ROI question directly. Three objectives anchored the work: engage key accounts and generate SQLs, maximize SQL-to-opportunity conversion through follow-up and nurturing, and optimize platform performance.

The GrowthSpree Approach

GrowthSpree ran personalized outreach to senior decision-makers — Directors, VPs, and Founders — across the automotive, telematics, and IT & services sectors, organized into Sales and Management campaigns under dedicated account owners. We nurtured replies toward qualified conversations and tracked every stage from connection request to opportunity.

Crucially, we ran the same program across LinkedIn and email to let data decide where to invest. The verdict was clear: LinkedIn via Dripify produced the overwhelming majority of replies, SQLs, and opportunities — so investment concentrated there while email messaging was earmarked for refinement.

Strategy at a Glance

Targeting

Senior decision-makers — Directors, VPs, and Founders — across automotive, telematics, and IT & Services.

Channels

The same program run head-to-head on LinkedIn (Dripify) and email (Lemlist) to let data decide where to invest.

Campaigns

Organized into Sales and Management campaigns under dedicated account owners for focused, accountable outreach.

Tracking & nurture

Every stage tracked from connection request to opportunity, with follow-ups converting SQLs into pipeline.

How GrowthSpree Saved the Day

Decision-Maker Targeting

We focused on senior roles — Directors, VPs, and Founders — across automotive, telematics, and IT & services, the buyers with real authority over fleet-safety decisions.

Directors · VPs · Founders
Senior Decision-Makers

Head-to-Head Channel Test

We ran LinkedIn (Dripify) and email (Lemlist) side by side and measured ROI per channel — letting performance, not assumption, decide where to invest.

Dripify vs Lemlist
LinkedIn vs Email

Campaign-Level Nurture

Organized into Sales and Management campaigns under dedicated account owners, with follow-ups and nurturing engineered to convert SQLs into opportunities.

Sales + Management
Owned, Nurtured Campaigns

The Results

284
Companies
Reached
28
SQLs
Generated
15
Opportunities
Created

Targeting top-level decision-makers across 284 companies, the program reached 869 contacts, earned 48 replies, generated 28 SQLs — a 9.86% interested rate — and created 15 sales opportunities, with LinkedIn (Dripify) driving the vast majority of pipeline.

The Business Impact

What the dual-channel ABM program delivered where it counts — pipeline, qualified demand, channel efficiency, and the channel verdict.

Pipeline — opportunities 15 sales opportunities created from 869 contacts, with LinkedIn driving 13 of them.
SQLs — qualified demand 28 SQLs generated — 24 from LinkedIn and 4 from email — off 48 replies.
CAC — channel efficiency 37.42% LinkedIn reply rate versus 2.67% on email, so spend concentrates where pipeline comes from.
Revenue — pipeline signal 13 of 15 opportunities came from LinkedIn, showing which channel to prioritize next.
Channel head-to-head in text (chart data)
ChannelReply rateSQLsOpportunities
LinkedIn (Dripify)37.42%2413
Email (Lemlist)2.67%42
Total2815
Interested replies by function in text (chart data)
FunctionInterested replies
Geotab Event12
Product7
Sales5
Management4
Total28

Performance Breakdown

From 869 contacts to 15 opportunities — and a clear verdict on channel, campaign, and audience.

The Overall ABM Funnel
How 869 contacts across 284 companies converted into 15 sales opportunities.
869
Contacts Reached
5.5% reply rate ↓
48
Replies
58% of replies → SQL ↓
28
SQLs
54% of SQLs → opportunity ↓
15
Opportunities
Across 284 target companies and both channels (Dripify + Lemlist).
Channel Outcomes: Dripify vs Lemlist
LinkedIn (Dripify) generated the overwhelming majority of SQLs and opportunities.
Dripify (LinkedIn) Lemlist (Email)
SQLs (Interested Replies)
Dripify
24
Lemlist
4
Opportunities Created
Dripify
13
Lemlist
2
Dripify sent 1,168 connection requests vs Lemlist's 486 emails.
Reply Rate by Channel
Dripify's reply rate ran roughly 14× Lemlist's — the clearest signal of where to invest.
Dripify (LinkedIn)
37.42%
Lemlist (Email)
2.67%
Dripify reply rate measured against accepted connections; Lemlist against emails sent.
Campaign Comparison: Sales vs Management
Both campaigns ran Dripify and Lemlist variations; Dripify led on engagement in each.
Dripify (Var1) Lemlist (Var1)
Sales Campaign — Requests Sent
Dripify
1,735
Lemlist
88
Sales Campaign — Replies
Dripify
32
Lemlist
11
Management Campaign — Replies
Dripify
24
Lemlist
11
Bars scaled within each metric group. Management Dripify also drove 3 SQLs and 2 opportunities.
Interested Replies by Function
Geotab-event and Product conversations led the interested-reply mix.
28 interested
Geotab Event 12 Product 7 Sales 5 Management 4
Interested-reply breakdown by function across the program.
Connection Acceptance by Channel
Both channels earned similar acceptance — the gap opened up at the reply stage.
Lemlist (Email)
24.69%
Dripify (LinkedIn)
25.86%
Accepted connections as a share of requests sent (Dripify 302/1,168; Lemlist 120/486).

Industry & Role Insights

Where the SQLs came from — and where the next gains are.

Highest-converting industries

Telematics and IT & Services were the dominant industries for SQLs, with decision-makers from Product Management and Sales showing significant interest.

Where to refine messaging

Transportation and Logistics drew more "Not Interested" replies — a signal that messaging and targeting for these sectors need tuning.

Roles that engaged most

Senior roles — Directors, VPs, and Founders — showed the highest engagement and were the key decision-makers in the targeted accounts.

The channel verdict

LinkedIn via Dripify delivered a 37.42% reply rate and the bulk of SQLs and opportunities, versus 2.67% on email — so investment concentrates on LinkedIn while email messaging is refined.

Frequently Asked Questions

The program reached 869 contacts across 284 companies, earned 48 replies, generated 28 SQLs (a 9.86% interested rate), and created 15 sales opportunities.
To engage key accounts and generate SQLs, maximize conversion of those SQLs into opportunities through follow-up and nurturing, and determine which outreach platform delivered the highest ROI.
LinkedIn via Dripify drove the vast majority of engagement — 24 SQLs and 13 opportunities at a 37.42% reply rate, versus 4 SQLs and 2 opportunities on email via Lemlist at a 2.67% reply rate.
Telematics and IT & Services were the dominant industries for SQLs, with strong interest from Product Management and Sales decision-makers. Senior roles — Directors, VPs, and Founders — showed the highest engagement.
Founded in 2015 and headquartered in Bengaluru, LightMetrics is an AI-powered platform for real-time driver coaching and safety analytics, improving fleet safety with automotive OEMs, Tier-1 suppliers, and telematics service providers.
By concentrating investment on LinkedIn, refining messaging for lower-engagement sectors like Transportation and Logistics, and adding more focused follow-ups and nurturing to convert the SQLs already generated.
In this head-to-head test, LinkedIn far outperformed email. LinkedIn via Dripify delivered a 37.42% reply rate and produced 24 of the 28 SQLs and 13 of the 15 opportunities, versus a 2.67% reply rate on email via Lemlist — so investment concentrated on LinkedIn while email messaging was refined.
A sales-qualified lead (SQL) is a prospect that has been vetted as a genuine fit and is ready for a sales conversation — a step beyond a marketing-qualified lead. For LightMetrics, 28 SQLs were nurtured into 15 sales opportunities across automotive and telematics accounts.

Let Us Make Your Growth Our Obsession

A quick 30-minute conversation, no strings attached. See how we can build an account-based engine that reaches your decision-makers and turns replies into real pipeline.

Meet With An Expert →