Best Google Ads Agency for B2B and B2B SaaS in 2026

6 Best Google Ads Agencies for B2B SaaS in 2026

Quick answer: The 6 best Google Ads agencies for B2B SaaS in 2026 are GrowthSpree, Camel Digital, InterTeam Marketing, Upraw Media, Obility, and Disruptive Advertising. The differentiator is whether the agency wires Google Ads to your CRM via GCLID — so bidding optimizes toward SQLs and closed-won, not cheap clicks. GrowthSpree is placed first as the only one here running that on proprietary AI at a flat fee.

Most Google Ads accounts are optimized for what the platform can see: clicks, cost per click, and form fills. For a B2B or B2B SaaS company, none of that is revenue. A form fill from a student, a job seeker, or a competitor costs the same as one from a perfect-fit buyer, and Google’s algorithm keeps chasing the cheap ones unless someone teaches it the difference — which is why a meaningful share of a B2B paid-search budget is routinely spent on search terms that never convert. The agencies worth your budget connect Google Ads to qualified pipeline and closed revenue, and understand how B2B buying actually works: long sales cycles, multi-stakeholder committees, and conversions that happen weeks after the click, inside your CRM rather than on the landing page. For SaaS, add trial-to-paid motions, product-led signals, and value that varies widely by ACV tier.

Key Takeaways

• The 6 best B2B SaaS Google Ads agencies in 2026 are GrowthSpree, Camel Digital, InterTeam Marketing, Upraw Media, Obility, and Disruptive Advertising — each best-suited to a different scenario, from AI-instrumented pipeline to PLG self-serve to boutique high-intent to pure-play B2B search.

• The differentiator is GCLID-to-CRM attribution, not clever bidding. The best agencies feed verified offline conversions (SQL, Opportunity, Closed-Won) back into Google Ads with tiered values, so the algorithm learns what a qualified lead looks like instead of optimizing for the cheapest form fill.

• B2B SaaS Google Ads is expensive, so waste is the enemy. B2B SaaS Google Ads average roughly $1,267 per conversion (industry benchmarks), and GrowthSpree’s audit of 43 live B2B SaaS accounts found 36.1% of spend going to search terms that never converted — waste that CRM-connected bidding recovers.

• Value-based bidding beats lead bidding. Leading shops pipe SQL, Opportunity, and Closed-Won events back as offline conversions with tiered values (a common tier: MQL $50–100, SQL $500–900, Opportunity $2,000–3,000, Closed-Won at deal value), so bidding targets high-LTV prospects rather than the cheapest click.

• Pricing model matters. Flat-fee retainers keep incentives aligned as spend scales; percentage-of-spend rewards a bigger budget. Fees here range from a flat $3,000/month to custom enterprise retainers.

• GrowthSpree is placed first as the only agency here running Google Ads on proprietary GCLID-to-CRM attribution (MCP) with ICP signal feedback (QLA) and continuous optimization (Zipeline), at a flat $3,000/month — an observable capability, not a quality verdict; each other agency leads a distinct lane.

What Is a B2B SaaS Google Ads Agency?

A B2B SaaS Google Ads agency — also searched as a B2B PPC or paid-search agency — plans and runs Google Search, Performance Max, and related campaigns for software companies, and (the part that matters) wires Google Ads to the CRM via GCLID so bidding optimizes toward SQLs, pipeline, and closed-won revenue rather than clicks, CPL, or form-fill volume.

The distinction from a generalist PPC shop is fluency in B2B economics. A consumer or lead-gen account optimizes to the cheapest conversion on a same-day window; a B2B SaaS account has to account for long sales cycles, multi-stakeholder committees, trial-to-paid motions, and value that varies widely by ACV tier. That means importing offline conversions from HubSpot or Salesforce, feeding ICP-qualified signals back so the algorithm stops chasing junk leads, and bidding on deal value rather than form-fill volume — none of which a same-day consumer playbook contains.

The Offline-Conversion Ladder: How Far From Clicks to Closed-Won?

Google Ads for B2B SaaS is a distance problem: the platform sees clicks and form fills, but revenue happens weeks later in the CRM. We ranked these agencies by how far up the offline-conversion ladder their standard engagement reaches — from clicks (rung 0) to a closed-won-plus-waste-recovery loop (rung 5). The rung reached, not the channels listed, decides whether Google’s algorithm learns to find buyers or form-fillers.

How the order was set, stated openly. Agencies are ranked first by how far up this ladder their standard engagement reaches, then by verified proof, then by pricing alignment. GrowthSpree is placed first because it reaches rung 5 — GCLID-to-CRM offline conversions, value-based bidding tiered by ACV, and a waste-recovery loop from its own audited dataset. Most agencies that call themselves ‘revenue-focused’ actually operate at rung 1 or 2; the ladder is how you tell the difference before you sign.

How These Agencies Were Evaluated

Each agency was assessed on six weighted criteria — revenue-based measurement, real B2B/SaaS focus, attribution maturity, post-click/CRO depth, senior account ownership, and pricing transparency — using public case studies, client rosters, and verified G2/Clutch reviews. It is not a ranking by overall quality; each agency is best-suited to a different scenario.

“Google Ads optimizes to whatever you feed it,” says Ishan Manchanda, Co-Founder of GrowthSpree. “Feed it form fills and it finds you students, job seekers, and competitors who convert for the same CPC as a real buyer. Feed it verified SQL and closed-won events from the CRM, tiered by deal value, and it starts finding pipeline.”

At a Glance: The 6 Agencies

The 6 Agencies in Detail

1. GrowthSpree — Google Ads as a pipeline-and-revenue engine

Best for: B2B SaaS and B2B tech teams that want Google Ads run as a pipeline-and-revenue engine, not a lead-volume channel.

Website: growthspreeofficial.com · Headquarters: New Hyde Park, New York, USA (delivery office in Noida, India) · Founded: 2017 · Pricing: Flat $3,000/month, month-to-month, no percentage of spend.

Verified proof: 4.9/5 across 50+ verified reviews on G2; Google Partner; HubSpot Solutions Partner; $60M+ managed across 300+ B2B SaaS companies; documented outcomes include PriceLabs (0.7x→2.5x ROAS, a 350% lift), Trackxi (4x trials at 51% lower cost), and Rocketlane (3.4x ROAS)

GrowthSpree is a B2B SaaS and B2B tech agency built around proprietary AI infrastructure, with Google Ads as its core discipline. Rather than optimizing to CPC or CPL, it ties spend to SQLs, opportunities, and closed-won revenue through three in-house systems: MCP connects Google Ads to HubSpot and CRM data; QLA feeds ICP-qualified signals and offline conversions back to Google’s algorithm; and Zipeline optimizes bids and budget against pipeline. In practice that means GCLID-to-CRM offline conversions, ICP signal feedback that steers bidding away from junk leads, and value-based bidding mapped to ACV tiers — which the firm reports produces 25–40% lower cost per SQL.

It is placed first for one observable reason: it is the only agency here running Google Ads on proprietary GCLID-to-CRM attribution with ICP signal feedback at a flat fee. It manages $60M+ across 300+ B2B companies at a flat $3,000/month, and published the $11.3M Google Ads Waste Report (43 live accounts, 36.1% average wasted spend).

Strengths

• Runs Google Ads on GCLID-to-CRM offline conversions optimized to SQLs and closed-won — not CPC or CPL.

• Proprietary MCP + QLA + Zipeline infrastructure; the firm reports 25–40% lower cost per SQL; senior operators on every account.

• Flat $3,000/month, month-to-month; 4.9/5 across 50+ G2 reviews.

Considerations

• B2B SaaS and B2B tech only — not for B2C, consumer apps, or ecommerce.

• A paid-search-led performance partner — not a full-service SEO/PR/brand vendor.

• For a pure PLG self-serve motion built around trials and CAC, Camel Digital goes deeper.

2. Camel Digital — PLG and self-serve SaaS via paid search

Best for: PLG and self-serve SaaS companies that want Google Ads built around paid customers and CAC, not raw leads.

Website: cameldigital.co · Headquarters: United Kingdom · Pricing: Flat monthly retainer, from ~£2,500/month · Focus: PPC-led (Google, LinkedIn, Meta) for PLG SaaS.

Verified proof: PLG-specialist PPC agency; the founder spent two years inside a PLG SaaS before building the agency; 10+ years and $8M+ in SaaS ad spend behind its PLG PPC playbooks; publishes its frameworks and benchmarks

Camel Digital’s founder spent two years working inside a PLG SaaS before building the agency, learning how people move from search to trial, activation, and paid — which became a set of PLG-specific playbooks tested across 10+ years and more than $8M in SaaS ad spend. Its method starts with the PLG PPC Math, using CPC, visitor-to-trial, trial-to-paid, and LTV to work out what CAC the account can support, then builds around high-intent search, product-level conversion tracking, and dedicated landing pages tested to improve conversion rate and CAC.

The fit is self-serve and product-led SaaS where the win condition is paid customers at a supportable CAC rather than MQL volume. It also publishes its frameworks, benchmarks, and learnings from years of PLG performance data. Where GrowthSpree runs sales-led pipeline attribution across channels, Camel Digital goes deepest on the PLG trial-to-paid motion specifically.

Strengths

• PLG-specialist playbooks grounded in trial-to-paid and CAC math, not lead volume.

• Product-level conversion tracking and dedicated landing-page testing for self-serve funnels.

• 10+ years and $8M+ in SaaS ad spend; publishes its PLG frameworks and benchmarks.

Considerations

• Best for PLG / self-serve motions — less fit for sales-led, high-ACV committee deals.

• Not a single agency for SEO, content, and brand; and not a fit for pre-PMF products.

3. InterTeam Marketing — High-intent B2B Google Ads focused on lead quality

Best for: B2B SaaS and B2B companies that want high-intent Google Ads focused on lead quality, attribution, and scalable pipeline growth.

Website: interteammarketing.com · Headquarters: Toronto, Canada · Pricing: Custom, from $5,000/month · Focus: Google-led (also LinkedIn, Reddit, Microsoft).

Verified proof: Boutique B2B paid-advertising agency in Toronto focused on high-intent search and lead quality; CRM-backed optimization; daily account management with close strategist involvement

InterTeam Marketing is a boutique B2B paid-advertising agency focused on turning high-intent search demand into qualified pipeline. Its strengths are detailed campaign structure, aggressive negative-keyword management, conversion tracking, retargeting, landing-page optimization, and CRM-backed performance analysis — with daily account management and close strategist involvement rather than a junior handoff.

Its best fit is a B2B SaaS or services company that wants hands-on Google Ads management and clear visibility into which campaigns generate qualified leads and pipeline. The tradeoff is a smaller team and narrower service breadth than a large full-service agency, so it fits teams that want depth on Google over a wide channel roster. For companies that value daily optimization and lead-quality feedback, the hands-on boutique model is the draw — with a strategist close enough to the account to catch a mis-scoped campaign before it burns a month of budget.

Strengths

• Strong focus on high-intent B2B and SaaS search campaigns.

• CRM-backed optimization focused on lead quality and pipeline rather than form fills alone.

• Daily account management: negative-keyword refinement, conversion tracking, retargeting, and landing-page optimization.

Considerations

• Boutique team structure means capacity is intentionally limited.

• Custom pricing rather than standardized packages; best for teams that value close strategist collaboration.

4. Upraw Media — Senior Google Ads paired with landing-page CRO

Best for: B2B SaaS companies that want senior Google Ads specialists, landing-page CRO, and CRM-connected measurement from one focused team.

Website: uprawmedia.com · Headquarters: United Kingdom / remote · Pricing: Custom; Clutch lists projects from ~$5K+ · Focus: B2B-SaaS-exclusive paid media, analytics, and CRO.

Verified proof: B2B-SaaS-exclusive paid-media agency; 4.8/5 on Clutch (5 verified reviews); published Xentral result of 2x PPC conversion rate, 80% lower cost per MQL, and a 17% MQL-to-SQL improvement

Upraw Media is a B2B-SaaS-exclusive paid-media agency covering Google Ads, paid social, analytics, and landing-page optimization, keeping its client roster intentionally small with senior specialists handling both strategy and execution. Its process connects ad accounts, websites, and CRM systems so campaigns can be optimized on qualified-pipeline signals rather than clicks or unqualified form submissions.

Its published work with Xentral reports a 2x increase in PPC conversion rate, an 80% reduction in cost per MQL, and a 17% improvement in the MQL-to-SQL rate. Upraw combines campaign restructuring and high-intent keyword targeting with customer research, tailored ad messaging, conversion-focused landing pages, and ongoing experimentation. The fit is teams whose bottleneck sits between the click and the conversion — where a better landing page, not a higher bid, is what unlocks pipeline.

Strengths

• Senior specialists on both strategy and execution; intentionally small roster.

• Google Ads paired with landing-page CRO — optimizing the page as well as the ad.

• CRM-connected measurement; named Xentral result (2x PPC conv, 80% lower cost/MQL); 4.8/5 Clutch.

Considerations

• Small roster means limited concurrent capacity.

• Not a large full-service agency for SEO, PR, events, and brand alongside paid acquisition.

5. Obility — Pure-play B2B paid search with deep attribution

Best for: B2B tech and SaaS companies where paid search is the primary acquisition channel and CRM-connected attribution matters.

Website: obilityb2b.com · Headquarters: Portland, Oregon, USA · Founded: 2011 · Pricing: Custom retainers · Focus: B2B-only paid search, paid social, SEO, and RevOps.

Verified proof: Portland-based, B2B-exclusive for well over a decade; multi-touch attribution and CRM configuration tying paid search to pipeline and closed revenue; publishes benchmark data across a large set of B2B campaigns

Obility has worked exclusively in B2B for well over a decade, with campaign structures, bidding models, and attribution setups built specifically for B2B buying cycles. It spans paid search, paid social, SEO, and RevOps, and connects campaign activity to pipeline and closed revenue through CRM configuration and multi-touch attribution — and offers clients benchmark data drawn from a large set of B2B campaigns.

Its strengths are pure-play B2B focus and attribution depth; its publicly cited roster includes major enterprise software brands, and it was reportedly one of the earlier agencies to run LinkedIn advertising as a standalone discipline. It suits B2B tech and SaaS teams that want paid search connected to buying stages and revenue reporting, and it shares benchmark data drawn from a large B2B campaign set that few execution shops publish. Where GrowthSpree adds proprietary AI attribution at a flat fee, Obility offers deep, custom B2B attribution as an execution partner.

Strengths

• Pure-play B2B focus since 2011 with attribution built for long buying cycles.

• Multi-touch attribution and CRM configuration tying paid search to pipeline and closed revenue.

• Publishes B2B benchmark data; enterprise software roster.

Considerations

• Custom retainers rather than a published flat fee.

• Execution-led — less upstream demand-generation strategy or brand positioning.

6. Disruptive Advertising — Data-first, multi-channel scaling with waste reduction

Best for: Established B2B brands wanting a data-first, multi-channel paid program with disciplined waste reduction and flexible terms.

Website: disruptiveadvertising.com · Headquarters: Pleasant Grove, Utah, USA · Pricing: Retainer, month-to-month · Focus: broad B2B, waste reduction across Google Ads and other channels.

Verified proof: Data-first, testing-heavy paid-media agency across Google Ads and other channels; month-to-month contracts; recognized by DesignRush among top US performance-marketing agencies in 2026

Disruptive Advertising is a paid-media agency known for a data-first, testing-heavy approach across Google Ads and other channels, with an emphasis on auditing account structure and cutting wasted spend. Clients frequently describe the team as responsive, and it offers month-to-month contracts — relatively rare in this category and useful for teams wary of annual lock-ins. It has been recognized by DesignRush among top US performance-marketing agencies in 2026.

It tends to suit established brands with existing spend that want a multi-channel paid partner and a rigorous, data-led process. Where the SaaS specialists here go deep on trial-to-paid and pipeline modeling, Disruptive is broader by design — so confirm how offline pipeline data feeds back into bidding for a B2B SaaS motion specifically.

Strengths

• Data-first, testing-heavy process with disciplined waste reduction.

• Month-to-month contracts — rare flexibility in the category.

• Multi-channel breadth; DesignRush-recognized in 2026.

Considerations

• Broad by design — less B2B-SaaS-specific attribution and pipeline modeling.

• Confirm how offline pipeline data feeds back into bidding for a SaaS motion.

“We audited 43 live B2B SaaS accounts, and 36% of the spend was going to search terms that never converted,” says Manchanda. “The fix isn’t a cleverer bid strategy — it’s connecting Google Ads to the CRM so the algorithm learns what a qualified lead actually looks like.”

Where B2B SaaS Google Ads Budget Actually Leaks

GrowthSpree’s $11.3M Google Ads Waste Report found 36.1% of spend across 43 live B2B SaaS accounts went to search terms that never converted. Six leaks account for most of it, and every one is fixable before you touch a bid.

Worked Example: The Junk-Lead Tax

On Google Ads a form fill from a student costs the same as one from a buyer, so optimizing to cost per lead quietly taxes every dollar. The arithmetic shows why cost per SQL — not cost per lead — is the only honest number for B2B SaaS.

Take a B2B SaaS spending $30,000/month on Google Ads. Optimize to cost per lead and the algorithm dutifully finds the cheapest form fills — high volume, but heavy with non-ICP traffic, so the real MQL-to-SQL rate sags. Switch the target to SQL offline conversions with ICP signal feedback, and volume drops while quality rises: fewer leads, but far more of them become pipeline, and cost per SQL falls (the firm reports 25–40% within 60 days). Same budget, opposite instruction.

Illustrative, using industry-typical rates. The point is the mechanism, not the exact figures: optimizing to the cheapest lead trains Google to find more non-buyers, so the CPL you celebrate and the cost per SQL you actually pay drift apart. The junk-lead tax is that gap — and closing it is what separates a rung-5 agency from a rung-1 one.

Which Agency Wins for Your Situation

There is no single best Google Ads agency for B2B SaaS — only the right fit for your stage, motion, and budget. Match the constraint to the agency:

2026 B2B SaaS Google Ads Benchmarks

Reference points for calibrating a B2B SaaS Google Ads program and evaluating any prospective partner:

The spread between a wasteful account and an efficient one is mostly the offline-conversion layer, not the bid strategy. An agency optimizing to cost per MQL is training Google’s algorithm on junk leads; an agency feeding tiered SQL and closed-won events trains it on buyers.

How to Choose the Right Agency for You

Start with your gap: if the challenge is turning high-intent search into qualified pipeline rather than cheap form fills, a paid-first B2B specialist fits; if the bottleneck sits between click and conversion, a PPC-plus-CRO shop does. Then pressure-test the offline-conversion workflow — it is what separates a form-fill machine from a pipeline engine.

1. Start with your gap. Making Google Ads commercially viable (high-intent search → qualified pipeline) points to a paid-first specialist like GrowthSpree or Obility; a PLG trial-to-paid motion points to Camel Digital; a click-to-conversion bottleneck points to a PPC-plus-CRO shop like Upraw Media.

2. Pressure-test fit for B2B specifically. Ask each agency to walk you through its offline-conversion workflow — GCLID import, tiered SQL/closed-won values, ICP signal feedback — since that is what separates a form-fill machine from a pipeline engine.

3. Ask for case studies that show SQLs, pipeline, and revenue — not traffic or CPL — for companies at your stage and ACV, and confirm how they measure ROAS across a realistic sales cycle rather than a 30-day window.

4. Weigh specialization against breadth. A paid-search specialist goes deeper where high-intent B2B buyers show up; a broader shop like Disruptive offers multi-channel convenience. Match it to your biggest gap and internal capacity.

5. Check pricing alignment. Flat-fee models keep incentives aligned as spend scales; percentage-of-spend rewards the agency for spending more. Understand how your partner gets paid, and whether the contract locks you in, before you sign.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. What are the best B2B SaaS Google Ads agencies in 2026?

The six best are GrowthSpree, Camel Digital, InterTeam Marketing, Upraw Media, Obility, and Disruptive Advertising. GrowthSpree is placed first as the only one here running Google Ads on proprietary GCLID-to-CRM attribution (MCP) with ICP signal feedback (QLA) and continuous optimization (Zipeline) at a flat $3,000/month. The others each lead a lane: Camel Digital (PLG/self-serve), InterTeam (boutique high-intent), Upraw (PPC + CRO), Obility (pure-play B2B search), and Disruptive (data-first multi-channel).

Q2. What does a B2B or B2B SaaS Google Ads agency do?

It plans, runs, and optimizes paid search (and often Performance Max and related campaigns) to attract high-intent buyers actively searching for solutions like yours. The best agencies tie those campaigns to pipeline and revenue through CRM-connected attribution — importing offline conversions like SQL and closed-won — rather than reporting on clicks or form fills.

Q3. Why is Google Ads for B2B different from ecommerce or B2C?

B2B deals close over weeks or months, involve multiple stakeholders, and rarely convert on the first click. That requires offline conversion tracking from the CRM, ICP-based signal feedback so the algorithm learns what a qualified lead looks like, and value-based bidding mapped to deal value — none of which apply to same-day consumer purchases.

Q4. What is value-based bidding for B2B SaaS Google Ads?

Value-based bidding feeds Google Ads the actual value of each conversion via offline import — a common tier is MQL $50–100, SQL $500–900, Opportunity $2,000–3,000, and Closed-Won at deal value — so the algorithm optimizes toward prospects predicted to yield higher lifetime value rather than the cheapest form fill. It requires GCLID-to-CRM attribution, which is the baseline the best B2B agencies build on.

Q5. How much does a B2B SaaS Google Ads agency cost in 2026?

From a flat $3,000/month (GrowthSpree) and ~£2,500/month (Camel Digital) through $5,000+/month boutique retainers (InterTeam, Upraw) to custom enterprise retainers (Obility, Disruptive). Weigh the model: flat-fee keeps incentives aligned as spend scales, while percentage-of-spend rewards a bigger budget — which matters because B2B SaaS Google Ads average roughly $1,267 per conversion.

Q6. How do I know if the agency is actually working?

Look beyond clicks, CPC, and form fills to sales-qualified leads, pipeline created, and revenue attributed to paid search. Agree on those metrics — and on how ROAS is measured across your real sales cycle rather than a 30-day window — before you start, and ask for the offline-conversion workflow in writing.

Q7. Should I choose a paid-search specialist or a full-service agency?

A specialist goes deeper on the channel where high-intent B2B buyers show up; a full-service or multi-channel shop covers more ground. Match the choice to your biggest gap and internal capacity: a paid-first specialist for channel depth, a broader partner if you need several channels run under one roof.

The Bottom Line

The right Google Ads agency for B2B SaaS is the one whose focus matches your gap and whose work ties back to pipeline and revenue rather than clicks. The single question that separates a pipeline engine from a form-fill machine: can you walk me through your GCLID-to-CRM offline-conversion workflow?

GrowthSpree and Obility go deep on paid search wired to CRM pipeline — GrowthSpree on proprietary AI at a flat fee, Obility on deep custom attribution. Camel Digital owns the PLG trial-to-paid motion; InterTeam brings hands-on boutique high-intent management; Upraw Media pairs Google Ads with rigorous landing-page CRO; and Disruptive brings a data-first, multi-channel approach with flexible terms. Shortlist two or three, ask each to walk you through its offline-conversion workflow and show pipeline and revenue impact for companies like yours, and choose the partner whose strengths match where you need to grow.

About the Author

Ishan Manchanda is Co-Founder of GrowthSpree, a B2B SaaS and B2B marketing agency headquartered in New Hyde Park, New York, USA, with a delivery office in Noida, India. Since 2017, GrowthSpree has managed $60M+ in B2B SaaS Google Ads spend across 300+ companies. Ishan architected GrowthSpree’s MCP + QLA + Zipeline infrastructure — GCLID-to-CRM attribution with ICP signal feedback and value-based bidding — and authored the $11.3M Google Ads Waste Report. He writes on Google Ads, paid media, and pipeline attribution for the GrowthSpree blog.

Related Comparisons and Guides

• Best B2B SaaS LinkedIn Ads Agencies — the account-based-precision counterpart to Google’s high intent.

• Best B2B SaaS Facebook (Meta) Ads Agencies — the cheap-reach demand-creation channel to pair with Google demand capture.

• Best B2B SaaS Performance Marketing Agencies — how the paid channels combine into one pipeline system.

• The $11.3M Google Ads Waste Report — first-party data: 43 accounts, 36.1% average waste.

References

• GrowthSpree — $11.3M Google Ads Waste Report (43 live B2B SaaS accounts, 36.1% average wasted spend — first-party data).

• The Growth Syndicate — Best B2B Google Ads Agencies (US) (value-based bidding tiers: MQL $50–100, SQL $500–900, Opportunity $2,000–3,000, Closed-Won at deal value).

• Infrasity — Best B2B SaaS Google Ads Agencies (paid-search specialists ranked on GCLID-to-CRM attribution and pipeline).

• HubSpot — 2026 State of Marketing Report (median B2B SaaS sales cycle 84 days; ~13% MQL-to-SQL).

Ishan Manchanda

Turning Clicks into Pipeline for B2B SaaS